<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d15044133\x26blogName\x3dmy+so+cal+life\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dTAN\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://160squarefeet.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://160squarefeet.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d3173943999802426191', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

8.24.2006

and then there were eight

It is official; a group of scientists from all over the world gathered in Prague today and decided that Pluto would no longer be considered a planet. Despite that fact that the now “dwarf planet” is some three and a half million miles from Earth, this decision still rocked my world. Thinking back to elementary school, I remember making mobiles of the solar system, and singing the little catchy mnemonic song to remember all nine planets. Whose cars is Neptune going to be selling now? As I was listening to a story on NPR the other day about the astronomical debate, someone made the comment that with current scientific data, the idea of Pluto as a full-fledged planet is nothing more than a historical artifact. My question is why isn’t that enough? Who is it really hurting if we continue to think of Pluto as the ninth planet of our solar system? Instead we are now going to have to totally change a truth that we have held for over seventy-five years.

Now I understand that sometimes certain beliefs need to be changed. If we never accepted new scientific research, we would still think the universe revolves around our flat world. But I think this actually illuminates what I consider a huge problem with science in general and astronomy in particular. Before I could graduate from college, I had to take one more science class, so my last summer at A&M, I took an astronomy class. The whole time I was listening to the professor, whose brilliant Russian accent made everything sound unnervingly sinister, I couldn’t help but think that these scientists were just making it up as they go along. Consider this: one of the main units of measurement used to indicate distances within the solar system is the astronomical unit. Conveniently enough one astronomical unit just happens to be the exact distance between the Earth and the Sun. They sure made it easy for themselves with that one.

More often than not, it seems that what is touted as scientific progress is actually just correcting mistakes. Probably the icing on the cake to my summer fling with astronomy is that right around the same time I was receiving my degree, I found out that some of the information I had learned in my class was already obsolete. In August of 2004, Stephen Hawking, one of the world’s leading theoretical physicists, announced that he had changed his mind about black holes. And just like that astronomy and quantum theory were changed.

I guess what gets me most is the amount of time, energy, and money that is spent on these kinds of endeavors. How much does the number of planets in our solar system really affect our daily lives? Is this decision going to stop hunger, help our environment, or end wars and genocide? If we really want to start changing historical artifacts, let’s begin with the ones that say people should be treated differently according to their gender or the color of their skin. We can spend all day with our eyes toward the sky, but our feet will always be planted on the ground; that is, until the laws of gravity go out of style.

3 Comments:

Blogger Randi said...

Good points, and funny!
Counterpoint (not mine):
"The reclassification of Pluto as a dwarf planet gives
us a unique opportunity to help the students
understand something about the nature of science. Too
often students (and adults) see science knowledge as a
set of facts which are definite and unchangeable
forever. However, science knowledge develops and our
understandings are modified based on new information
and interpretations. When Pluto was discovered, it was
thought to be larger than the Earth and we had little
knowledge of all the diverse objects farther out. As
new observations were made, it became necessary to
develop a more effective classification system to
organize our understanding of objects in the solar
system. This new classification system is shaking up
one of our understandings about the world around us,
but then so did the work of Copernicus and Galileo
when they suggested that the sun did not revolve
around the Earth."

8/25/2006  
Blogger g the therapist said...

HA - sounds like a cop-out to me! :) Give me something concrete...I'm starting to doubt lots of things now. Can someone help me - I've been out of the country and I don't read the MSN blurbs - does 2+2 still = 4?

Just kidding - isn't God amazing! He keeps us guessing everday...

8/27/2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

rock on wendy! i dig your points & the way you put them!

8/29/2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home